Friday, January 26, 2007

The Mythology of Bush's Intelligence

It actually takes a certain of amount of intelligence to have sufficient credibility and power to drive a major corporation straight into the ground. Whatever intelligence Bush supposedly has, it's obviously not the whole package.

From American Prospect, here's some excerpts from Harold Meyerson's take on the White House hedgehog:
...Bush, in all matters pertaining to his war, is a one-trick president who keeps doing the same thing over and over, never mind that it hasn't worked. In Isaiah Berlin's typology of leaders, Bush isn't merely a hedgehog who knows one thing rather than many things. He's a delusional hedgehog who knows one thing that isn't so.

(snip)

In the war itself, meanwhile, our current policy has achieved new depths of senselessness. The administration is lining up support from our longtime Sunni allies in the region -- Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt in particular -- as a buffer against the spreading influence of Shiite Iran within Iraq and across the Middle East. Inside Iraq, meanwhile, we have cast our lot with the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a sectarian Shiite with long-standing ties to Iran, and hedged our bet by cultivating the support of another Shiite leader, Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, who is even closer to Iran.

(snip)

More broadly, our plan for stability in Iraq is to bolster whichever Shiite administration governs the country, no matter its closeness to Iran, in the groundless hope that it will establish nonsectarian order. Our plan for stability in the region is to enlist Sunni states to contain Iran. These plans cancel each other out.

This isn't an example of Kissingerian subtlety -- waging the Cold War, for instance, by tilting toward China over the Soviet Union. This is an example of world-class incoherence, entirely of our own making. We charged into Iraq with some dim sense that Hussein's successor government would be headed by representatives of the long-persecuted Shiite majority, but we assumed that comity would prevail between the Shiites and the displaced Sunnis. Then we rendered that dicey proposition all but impossible by sacking the Iraqi army and most of the civil service -- in effect, plunging the Sunni population into mass unemployment with no prospect of reemployment. We fed the Sunni resistance, which fed the Shiite retaliation.

At Enron, there was one division that made money when the price of energy went up and another division that lost money at nearly twice the rate of the first division when the price of energy went up. When the first division started illegally manipulating energy prices because of fat bonuses based on gross sales, it never bothered to talk to the other division which curiously was in the same building; nor did the higher ups pay much attention. Sounds like the Bush Administration. And it is a functional result of the head man living in a bubble.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home